ABOUT 12 HOURS AGO • 10 MIN READ

🏈December Football: Big Matchups & Edges Everywhere!

profile

Advanced Sports Betting Analytics

Subscribe to our email list and stay ahead of the game with cutting-edge analytics, insider trends, and actionable stats you won’t find anywhere else.

Football Betting Insights

December football shifts into its most meaningful stretch as NFL Week 15 playoff races tighten, the Army–Navy rivalry takes center stage, and the college bowl season officially kicks off. This week’s StatSharp newsletter cuts through the noise with data-driven insights on the matchups that matter most — from system trends and simulation edges to player prop angles and momentum-based indicators that consistently outperform public perception. With teams fighting for playoff berths, bowl positioning, and rivalry bragging rights, the margins get thinner and the value gets sharper. This edition delivers the strongest angles across both the NFL and college landscape to help you attack one of the most profitable weeks of the year.

🏈⭑Power Rating Model Showcase

The StatSharp Power Rating Model distills each matchup into a clear, data-driven projection that blends offensive strength, defensive efficiency, expected scoring, and market line evaluations. These summary cards provide an at-a-glance view of where the model finds actionable value—whether against the spread, on the moneyline, or in the totals market—by comparing projected outcomes to current odds. With each card highlighting the strongest percentage edges and matchup dynamics, bettors gain immediate insight into which teams the model believes are undervalued, which totals are mispriced, and how each game is most likely to unfold.

Troy vs Jacksonville State
9:00 PM · Salute to Veterans Bowl · Cramton Bowl · Montgomery, AL
Projection: Troy 22, Jacksonville State 24
Power Ratings (Off/Def): Troy OffR 27 · DefR 8  |  Jacksonville State OffR 32 · DefR 5
Line: Troy -2.5
Cover%: Troy 36.2% · Jacksonville State 63.8%
ATS Edge: Jacksonville State (+4.5)
ML: Troy -142 (43.4%) · Jacksonville State +120 (56.6%)
ML Edge: Jacksonville State (+11.1%)
O/U: 46.5 · Over 49.2% · Under 50.8%
O/U Edge: Under (+0.5)

Baltimore at Cincinnati
Sunday · 1:00 PM · AFC North Rivalry
Projection: Baltimore 32, Cincinnati 26
Power Ratings (Off/Def): BAL OffR 32 · DefR 7  |  CIN OffR 32 · DefR -1
Line: BAL -2.5
Cover%: BAL 58.2% · CIN 41.8%
ATS Edge: Baltimore (+3.5)
ML: BAL -142 (64.4%) · CIN +120 (35.6%)
ML Edge: Baltimore (+5.7%)
O/U: 51.5 · Over 58.4% · Under 41.6%
O/U Edge: Over (+6.5)
BAL TT: 27.5 · Over 60.6% · Under 39.4% · Edge: Over (+4.5)
CIN TT: 24.5 · Over 54.2% · Under 45.8% · Edge: Over (+1.5)

Unlock the full board of this week’s Power Rating projections by subscribing to StatSharp Pro. Members receive complete model outputs for every NFL game, every bowl matchup, and all postseason action—plus ATS edges, moneyline value ratings, team totals, and premium simulation summaries. If you want the entire slate of predictive analytics that sharp bettors rely on, StatSharp Pro delivers it every single week.

🏈⭑Game Simulation Spotlight

  • Key Weekend Matchups

StatSharp’s Game Simulation model has run the numbers for some of this weekend’s biggest matchups for College Football and the NFL. Below are the projected scores, betting lines, and edges our model highlights for key games on the slate.

Boise State vs Washington
Saturday · 8:00 PM · LA Bowl
Projected Score: Washington 40 · Boise State 18
Proj. Total: 58 points (above market 52.5)
Spread (market): Washington -10
ATS Edge: Washington (+12) vs the number
Takeaway: Model expects Washington to win comfortably, projecting a margin well beyond the current double-digit spread.
1H Line (market): Washington -6 · 1H Total 26.5
Proj. 1H Score: Washington 18 · Boise State 9 (Total 27)
1H ATS Edge: Washington (+3) vs implied spread
1H Total Edge: Slight lean to the Over (proj 27 vs 26.5)
Key Stat Observations:
Rushing: BSU 36–126 (3.5 YPR) · WASH 37–202 (5.4 YPR)
Passing: BSU 29–169 (5.9 YPA) · WASH 30–228 (7.7 YPA)
Total Plays/Yards: BSU 65–295 · WASH 67–430 (Washington +135 yards, +2 plays)
Yards/Play: BSU 4.5 · WASH 6.4 (clear efficiency edge Washington)
Turnovers: BSU 1–1 · WASH 1–1 (neutral turnover projection)
Game Flow: Washington’s balanced offense generates chunk gains on the ground and through the air, while Boise State is forced into longer, less efficient drives.
Simulation Edge Summary:
Simulations point to Washington controlling this LA Bowl matchup with superior efficiency on both sides of the ball, building a strong yardage and scoring cushion as the game progresses. Boise State’s offense projects to move the ball in spurts but struggles to match Washington’s explosiveness or finishing ability in the red zone. Overall, the model favors Washington -10 as the stronger ATS position and shows value on the Over 52.5, with a projected total of 58 points in a game where Washington’s offense drives most of the scoring.

Buffalo at New England
Sunday · 1:00 PM · Key AFC East Battle
Projected Score: New England 27 · Buffalo 24
Proj. Total: 51 points (above market 49.5)
Spread (market): Bills -1.5
ATS Edge: Patriots (+4.5) vs the number
Takeaway: Model calls this a tight divisional game but tilts slightly toward New England as a short home dog.
1H Line (market): Bills -1 · 1H Total 25
Proj. 1H Score: Patriots 13 · Bills 10 (Total 23)
1H ATS Edge: Patriots (+3) vs implied spread
1H Total Edge: Lean to the Under (proj 23 vs 25)
Key Stat Observations:
Rushing: BUF 30–146 (4.9 YPR) · NE 29–123 (4.2 YPR)
Passing: BUF 27–191 (7.1 YPA) · NE 28–230 (8.3 YPA)
Total Plays/Yards: BUF 56–337 · NE 57–352 (Patriots +15 yards, +1 play)
Yards/Play: BUF 6.0 · NE 6.2 (slight efficiency edge New England)
Turnovers: BUF 1–1 · NE 1–1 (neutral turnover projection)
Game Flow: Both teams balance run and pass, with Buffalo leaning a bit more on the ground and New England generating slightly more explosive production through the air.
Simulation Edge Summary:
Simulations show a classic AFC East grinder, with Josh Allen driving Buffalo’s offense through a mix of designed runs and intermediate throws, supported by James Cook keeping the Bills on schedule on early downs. On the other side, Drake Maye and the Patriots’ passing game quietly post the more explosive per-throw profile, nudging New England ahead on total yardage and late-game scoring potential. Overall, the model leans to Patriots +1.5 as a live home underdog while showing mild value on the Over 49.5, with a projected total of 51 points in a competitive divisional showdown.
Detroit at LA Rams
Sunday · 4:25 PM · Battle of NFC Playoff Contenders
Projected Score: LA Rams 32 · Detroit 25
Proj. Total: 57 points (above market 54.5)
Spread (market): Rams -6
ATS Edge: Slight lean to Rams (-6) with model projecting a 7-point margin
Takeaway: Simulations favor Los Angeles to hold serve at home, but keep Detroit within backdoor range in a high-scoring environment.
1H Line (market): Rams -3 · 1H Total 27.5
Proj. 1H Score: Rams 12 · Lions 11 (Total 23)
1H ATS Edge: Lean to Detroit (+3) vs implied spread
1H Total Edge: Under, with model 4.5 points below the 1H total (proj 23 vs 27.5)
Key Stat Observations:
Rushing: DET 28–134 (4.7 YPR) · LAR 27–123 (4.6 YPR)
Passing: DET 32–227 (7.1 YPA) · LAR 34–259 (7.7 YPA)
Total Plays/Yards: DET 61–362 · LAR 61–382 (Rams +20 yards, equal play volume)
Yards/Play: DET 6.0 · LAR 6.3 (efficiency edge Rams)
Turnovers: DET 1–1 · LAR 1–1 (neutral turnover projection)
Game Flow: Both offenses move the ball efficiently with balanced run/pass splits, but the Rams generate slightly more explosive production through the air.
Simulation Edge Summary:
Simulations set up this NFC showdown as a playoff-caliber shootout, with Jared Goff and Amon-Ra St. Brown keeping Detroit’s offense on schedule through efficient intermediate passing and a solid ground game. The Rams answer with a slightly more explosive profile led by Matthew Stafford, who connects downfield with weapons like Puka Nacua while the run game provides just enough balance to keep Detroit’s defense honest. Overall, the model leans to Rams -6 as a modestly profitable side and shows value on the Over 54.5, with a projected total of 57 points in a game where both quarterbacks are expected to trade punches deep into the fourth quarter.

The StatSharp Game Simulation is just one of the many exclusive tools included with a StatSharp Pro subscription. From advanced matchup simulators and player prop records to betting system trends and team stat breakdowns, StatSharp Pro gives you the data edge to make smarter, sharper wagers. Don’t just guess — become a Sharper bettor with the full power of StatSharp at your fingertips.

Bet Smarter = Data & Analytics > Gut Feeling

Stop guessing! StatSharp Pro delivers data-backed insights, power ratings, and proven systems you won’t find from Twitter picks or TV “experts.” Make sharper bets with numbers that matter. Winning Sports Bettors rely on data insights and analytics!

Sign up today!

📒Profitable Trend & System Report

🧩 Revenge Road Teams Deliver

Motivated road teams excel in revenge spots.

Bet on - Road teams where the line is +3 to -3 - revenging a loss against opponent, team with a losing record in the second half of the season. Record: 33-9 (79%) since 2016!

When a losing-team road favorite or short underdog gets a second shot at an opponent that beat them earlier in the season, the motivational edge becomes real — and historically profitable. These teams are either fighting to remain in the playoff conversation (as in the case with the Ravens) or, if already out of contention, fueled by external motivators such as pride, coaching evaluation, and roster competitiveness. In tightly lined games (+3 to -3), oddsmakers signal that the matchup is expected to be competitive, which amplifies the impact of urgency, focus, and situational motivation. That dynamic has produced a powerful system since 2016, with revenge-minded road teams covering the number at a remarkable 33–9 (78.6%) rate.

The underlying theory is that competitive-road environments heighten discipline and simplify game plans, often resulting in fewer mistakes and a sharper performance from the team seeking payback. Meanwhile, the opponent — who already secured a win earlier in the season — may subconsciously underweight adjustments or underestimate the desperation of the rematch situation. On average, these revenge teams outscore opponents 19.9 to 18.8, but more importantly, they exceed the spread by meaningful margins, covering by 7+ points in nearly 40% of all qualifying games. This week, the setup aligns squarely with Baltimore, who fits the profile of a focused, revenge-driven road team positioned to outperform expectations against Cincinnati.


Mahomes' Passing Volume Spikes vs. AFC West

Division opponents know Kansas City better than anyone — their personnel, their tendencies, and the structure of Andy Reid’s offense. With that level of familiarity comes tighter coverage windows, more disguised pressures, and a greater emphasis on forcing the Chiefs to beat them methodically rather than explosively. In these situations, Reid leans on his greatest advantage: Patrick Mahomes’ ability to process, adjust, and create. That reliance consistently manifests in increased passing volume whenever Kansas City faces a division rival.

The data backs up the pattern. Mahomes has gone 11–2 (84.6%) to the Over on his passing attempts prop in division matchups since 2023, averaging 39.2 attempts in games where the line is set near 34.8. Familiar foes take away the easy explosives, but in doing so, they invite Reid to put the ball in the hands of his superstar quarterback and let him dictate the game. The result is predictable: more dropbacks, longer drives, and a consistently elevated attempt count that has delivered +8.7 units of profit for Over bettors.


Cleveland Browns Logo
Browns' Road Skid vs. Strong Offenses

Despite having one of the league’s most disruptive defensive forces in Myles Garrett, the Browns have struggled mightily when facing high-powered offenses on the road. Against teams averaging 24+ points per game, Cleveland’s defensive front is often unable to mask broader structural issues, including inconsistent offensive support and a tendency to fall behind early — forcing the defense into unfavorable, high-snap-volume situations. Since the 2024 season, Cleveland is 0–8 ATS in these road matchups, getting outscored by an average of 28.8 to 11.5, a sign that elite offenses exploit their weaknesses faster than the Browns can generate pressure. The theory is simple: Garrett can wreck plays, but he cannot compensate for an offense that stalls or a defense stretched thin by constant short-field or high-tempo scenarios, making this another matchup that tilts toward Chicago.

Buffalo Bills Logo
Buffalo Turns Big Games Into Shootouts

Under Sean McDermott, Buffalo has turned late-season road matchups against elite opponents into high-scoring track meets, driven by a combination of offensive dependency and defensive vulnerability. Against teams winning over 75% of their games, the Bills lean heavily on Josh Allen’s arm and improvisation ability to keep pace, often abandoning balance in favor of aggressive, high-volume offense. Meanwhile, Buffalo’s defense has repeatedly struggled to slow down top-tier opponents in these pressure-packed games, creating back-and-forth scoring environments where possessions become precious and explosive plays define outcomes. The results are staggering: McDermott’s Bills are 7–0 to the Over in these situations, with an average combined score of 62.6 points, far eclipsing the average total of 49.4. When Buffalo faces elite competition on the road late in the year, shootouts become the norm — a trend once again pointing Over in this week’s matchup.

Army Logo Navy Logo
Rushing Battle Decides Army–Navy

For more than three decades, the Army–Navy rivalry has been defined by one unmistakable pattern: the team that wins the rushing battle almost always wins the game. With both academies historically running variations of the triple option, the defenses know the opposing system inside and out, creating a matchup in which execution, discipline, and line play matter far more than schematic surprises. Since 1992, the team with more rushing yards is an astounding 28–5, and even the five exceptions were decided by one score or less. That level of consistency shows how closely tied this rivalry is to ball control and physicality — whichever side controls tempo on the ground typically controls the scoreboard.

This year’s matchup once again hinges on which offense asserts itself in the trenches. Army enters averaging 257.2 rushing yards per game with a time of possession edge, while Navy boasts an even more explosive ground attack at 298.8 rushing yards per game and an impressive 6.1 yards per carry. Both defenses have also seen heavy run workloads all season, which makes early drive success and third-down conversions particularly critical. Given the historical data and the 2025 statistical profile of each team, the equation is simple: the rushing winner holds a massive advantage, and identifying which side can consistently stay on schedule will likely reveal the winner of America’s most tradition-rich rivalry.

Your Edge Starts with Numbers

Stop relying on hunches — win with StatSharp Pro’s power ratings and systems.

Stay Connected with StatSharp

Follow us on social media for the latest sports analytics, data insights, and updates.

StatSharp, LLC | 777 N. Jefferson Street Suite 408 #1138 | Milwaukee, WI 53202 US

Please don't reply to this e-mail. You've been sent this message because you signed up at StatSharp.com or previously at one of our our predecessor sites StatFox/FoxSheets. If you don't wish to receive these types of emails, then follow the link to Unsubscribe. You can adjust your E-mail Preferences here.

Advanced Sports Betting Analytics

Subscribe to our email list and stay ahead of the game with cutting-edge analytics, insider trends, and actionable stats you won’t find anywhere else.